I still don't understand why some people STILL defend her, or try to justify her. I still don't get how some still compare her to Angelina.There is a vast difference between the two, and regardless of Angelina's character flaws, at least she and her brood won't need to leech off the government.It is very hard not to be mean to Nadya. It is NOT her children that most of us have a problem with, it's her. People who defend her are missing the point entirely. What makes any of you "Team Nadya" people think that this woman is capable of taking care of those cihldren? This woman is clearly out of touch. How does anyone in her right mind bring children into the world when they cannot take care of them? My concern is for those children, and for their wellbeing. Why can't those of you that come to her defense see that? It is not that people want to be in her business, but when she uses the taxpayer's money to it then it is. It becomes people's business when she has such little regard for personal responsibility. The fact of the matter is that she chose to have 8 more even though she already had 6 and 3 of those kids are special needs children. Oh, and one more thing. I think her Ethnic background is inconsequential. The fact is that she is either a very disturbed person, or a despicable freeloading moocher. In both instances, I think those children would be better off with families who can provide for them both financially and emotionally.
For those of you who still don't see the problem with this woman having 8 kids at once even though she had 6 already... (je032288) Here is an explanation that I hope you will understand. While Angelina Jolie to some might be despicable, a homewrecker or what have you, at least she is not leeching off the government. As bad as some people dislike Angelina, it is wise to admit that. The real issue is Nadya's inability to be in touch with reality. I'm sure that those of you who have children know that it takes more than love to raise one. It takes the ability to provide for them in every sense. This woman is clearly not capable of doing this. Why?... well here is the condensed list. 1. She is unemployed. 2. She is supposedly (or was) on disability 3. Has no sense of responsibility Who do you think will ultimately be responsible for footing the bill for those innocent children? We will. The taxpayers. So, before trying to draw parallels between these women, let's realize that aside from the supposed physical resemblance there is NOTHING else. One is a public figure, an entertainer who aside from her personality or character flaws at least has the means to support those kids she has. Angelina is not asking for handouts. Nadya is asking for a free ride and using her children to do it. So IF Angelina did call Nadya "creepy", it's something most of us think anyway.
You're right, we don't know her personally. People threatening her is crossing the line. However, do you honestly think that this woman (based on what we all do know) can support these kids? She is unemployed, and she lives with her parents in a modest home. You seem to overlook the fact that sooner or later, this woman's poor choices will be paid for by us the taxpayers. Now Pinky2, if you have a job you know how hard it is to earn a buck nowdays. Why would you want to work hard to help support a woman, whose obvious intent was to profit from her children?I'm sorry, but her newborn babies were NOT a miracle. It is unfair and selfish to bring children into the world before having the means to provide for them in EVERY way. The real victims here are those children. Not this out of touch woman.
It is extrememly difficult to not "judge" this woman. However, she did put herself out there for public scrutiny. There are a couple of people that say "those are her kids, and it's her business". That is true, however it is not like this woman is capable of taking care of them. She does not have the resources, to do so. I don't only speak of monetary resources, but mental capability as well. How on earth will she convince people that she can take care of those children, when she doesn't even have a job? Excuse me, but there are people out there with years of work experience and degrees who are UNEMPLOYED because of the shitty economy. This woman is clearly out of touch with reality. I don't think anyone is doubting her ability to love those children. What most of us have serious doubts on are her mental and reasoning capabilities. What upsets most is that it is becoming more evident that she was trying to take full advantage of it all. Freebies and such. The woman is a MOOCHER. ..and by the way, it is completely ridiculous that she denies having any cosmetic stuff done. Not only is she obviously not mentally sound, but it looks like she might be a compulsive liar as well.
I don't think that the Prop.8 supporters fully understand what the difference is between the rights granted to domestic partnerships and married couples are. There are rights that married couples have, that those in domestic partnerships don't. Civil Unions still don't provide the SAME rights as a marriage. It is unfortunate that people who don't fully understand the issue, were allowed to vote on it. Most of them were guided (or rather misguided) by their moral conviction. You see, now same-sex couples can no longer obtain a marriage license. Meaning not even a civil marriage is possible. Gays would not go in hordes to demand a religious ceremony, a civil one sufficed. They were able to do it for a few months before those driven by ignorance voted to have that taken away. For those bashing churches, I think you should know that there are infact churches that have performed religious same-sex marriage ceremonies. Not because they were forced, but because they wanted to. Unfortunately, it is those with the deeper pockets that were able to influence the votes of those who didn't understand or care to learn more about the issue. I hope that this Proposition is seen as what it really is. It was not about preservation or protection. Preserving and protecting would have implied making divorce more difficult in hopes of bringing it to a number less appaling than 50%... Not stopping people who want the same rights as those who take it for granted already enjoy.
Here is an explanation that I hope you will understand.
While Angelina Jolie to some might be despicable, a homewrecker or what have you, at least she is not leeching off the government. As bad as some people dislike Angelina, it is wise to admit that.
The real issue is Nadya's inability to be in touch with reality. I'm sure that those of you who have children know that it takes more than love to raise one. It takes the ability to provide for them in every sense. This woman is clearly not capable of doing this. Why?... well here is the condensed list.
1. She is unemployed.
2. She is supposedly (or was) on disability
3. Has no sense of responsibility
Who do you think will ultimately be responsible for footing the bill for those innocent children? We will. The taxpayers.
So, before trying to draw parallels between these women, let's realize that aside from the supposed physical resemblance there is NOTHING else. One is a public figure, an entertainer who aside from her personality or character flaws at least has the means to support those kids she has. Angelina is not asking for handouts. Nadya is asking for a free ride and using her children to do it. So IF Angelina did call Nadya "creepy", it's something most of us think anyway.
There are a couple of people that say "those are her kids, and it's her business". That is true, however it is not like this woman is capable of taking care of them. She does not have the resources, to do so. I don't only speak of monetary resources, but mental capability as well. How on earth will she convince people that she can take care of those children, when she doesn't even have a job? Excuse me, but there are people out there with years of work experience and degrees who are UNEMPLOYED because of the shitty economy.
This woman is clearly out of touch with reality. I don't think anyone is doubting her ability to love those children. What most of us have serious doubts on are her mental and reasoning capabilities.
What upsets most is that it is becoming more evident that she was trying to take full advantage of it all. Freebies and such. The woman is a MOOCHER.
..and by the way, it is completely ridiculous that she denies having any cosmetic stuff done. Not only is she obviously not mentally sound, but it looks like she might be a compulsive liar as well.
Civil Unions still don't provide the SAME rights as a marriage.
It is unfortunate that people who don't fully understand the issue, were allowed to vote on it. Most of them were guided (or rather misguided) by their moral conviction. You see, now same-sex couples can no longer obtain a marriage license. Meaning not even a civil marriage is possible. Gays would not go in hordes to demand a religious ceremony, a civil one sufficed. They were able to do it for a few months before those driven by ignorance voted to have that taken away.
For those bashing churches, I think you should know that there are infact churches that have performed religious same-sex marriage ceremonies. Not because they were forced, but because they wanted to. Unfortunately, it is those with the deeper pockets that were able to influence the votes of those who didn't understand or care to learn more about the issue.
I hope that this Proposition is seen as what it really is. It was not about preservation or protection. Preserving and protecting would have implied making divorce more difficult in hopes of bringing it to a number less appaling than 50%... Not stopping people who want the same rights as those who take it for granted already enjoy.