Heathers doesn't need sequel. All of the actors who played the surviving characters are a bit too old for one now anyway so it would have to be re-cast unless it was set many years later.
To those who think that bad sequels somehow ruin the original movie... How does a sequel or even a remake ruin a pre-existing movie? That movie is still there, unchanged. If you liked it before, you'll still like it. And if you don't like the idea of a sequel, then don't watch it.
AND QUIT, FUCKING, TYPING IN ALL CAPS. THE CAPS LOCK BUTTON IS ON THE LEFT OF YOUR KEYBOARD. TURN IT OFF AND KNOCK THAT SHIT OFF. YOU'VE BEEN USING A KEYBOARD LONG ENOUGH NOW TO KNOW BETTER.
I don't see anything ethically wrong with it, though it is rather odd. What does the mother intend to do with his sperm? Will she be interviewing potential mothers to be impregnated and give birth to fatherless children?
I was a bit confused about the relevance of this statement: "[...] state law gives parents control over a child's body for organ and tissue donations but its use for sperm 'is very unclear.'" If the guy was 21, what relevance does that statement have to this issue? She may be his mother but he is (was) an adult.
I'm also curious if the method for sperm extraction is the same for the dead (on life support) as it is for the living...
Anyways, as someone else said, it would make sense if his wife, or even his girlfriend, wanted the sperm, but the mother wanting it is really strange.
To those who think that bad sequels somehow ruin the original movie... How does a sequel or even a remake ruin a pre-existing movie? That movie is still there, unchanged. If you liked it before, you'll still like it. And if you don't like the idea of a sequel, then don't watch it.
AND QUIT, FUCKING, TYPING IN ALL CAPS. THE CAPS LOCK BUTTON IS ON THE LEFT OF YOUR KEYBOARD. TURN IT OFF AND KNOCK THAT SHIT OFF. YOU'VE BEEN USING A KEYBOARD LONG ENOUGH NOW TO KNOW BETTER.
WeekWeak at 04:34 04/14/2009I was a bit confused about the relevance of this statement: "[...] state law gives parents control over a child's body for organ and tissue donations but its use for sperm 'is very unclear.'" If the guy was 21, what relevance does that statement have to this issue? She may be his mother but he is (was) an adult.
I'm also curious if the method for sperm extraction is the same for the dead (on life support) as it is for the living...
Anyways, as someone else said, it would make sense if his wife, or even his girlfriend, wanted the sperm, but the mother wanting it is really strange.