It's not just going to be the LGBT community protesting. There are a lot of heterosexuals who will be there right alongside you, to show support. My husband and I have already had to arrange for another car to get everyone down to our local rally when we offered to drive... and every single person who's joining us is straight.
I see no difference in the level of love and commitment between my husband and I, and between my gay couple friends. They're raising families, have life-long commitments, love each other deeply... to deny them the same right I have just because that doesn't fit in with some third party's moral code?
I said this in a different post, and I'll say it again: It may be against your moral code for two homosexuals to marry. It just so happens that it's against my moral code for hateful bigots to breed. So, no more children for you! Let's just nip that right in the bud, shall we? If you can apply your moral code to the rest of the country, well, right back atcha :)
Not anything that was said by either party - no, the funny part was watching the lame (and ultimately, fruitless) attempt to create some kind of "story" out of it.
Sorry dude, no lies in there. Of course, there would have been if you'd included the one where Angelina said she'd "never slept with a married man".
Ultra-classy move going after the woman who got cheated on while excusing the husband-stealer. So tell us, do you blame it on the wife when the husband beats the hell out of her? Or blame the 13 year old girl for getting raped when her skirt is too short?
You mentioned "BTW when the LDS faith performs a baptism for a deceased person, that person has the privilege to either accept it, or deny it, they're not involuntarily baptized."
I'm a bit confused on this. How does a dead person accept or deny a baptism?
This was done for (to?) a friend of mine - an avowed atheist - who's Mormon Aunt-in-law decided several days after my friend's death that she needed to be baptized. I'm quite sure that, having already been creamated at that point, my friend didn't have a chat with her Aunt in which she gave her blessing.
I see no difference in the level of love and commitment between my husband and I, and between my gay couple friends. They're raising families, have life-long commitments, love each other deeply... to deny them the same right I have just because that doesn't fit in with some third party's moral code?
I said this in a different post, and I'll say it again: It may be against your moral code for two homosexuals to marry. It just so happens that it's against my moral code for hateful bigots to breed. So, no more children for you! Let's just nip that right in the bud, shall we? If you can apply your moral code to the rest of the country, well, right back atcha :)
Not anything that was said by either party - no, the funny part was watching the lame (and ultimately, fruitless) attempt to create some kind of "story" out of it.
Sorry dude, no lies in there. Of course, there would have been if you'd included the one where Angelina said she'd "never slept with a married man".
Ultra-classy move going after the woman who got cheated on while excusing the husband-stealer. So tell us, do you blame it on the wife when the husband beats the hell out of her? Or blame the 13 year old girl for getting raped when her skirt is too short?
Asshole.
WeekWeak at 10:11 11/11/2008 as a reply on the comment by Me's-loves-me's-some-cartelYou mentioned "BTW when the LDS faith performs a baptism for a deceased person, that person has the privilege to either accept it, or deny it, they're not involuntarily baptized."
I'm a bit confused on this. How does a dead person accept or deny a baptism?
This was done for (to?) a friend of mine - an avowed atheist - who's Mormon Aunt-in-law decided several days after my friend's death that she needed to be baptized. I'm quite sure that, having already been creamated at that point, my friend didn't have a chat with her Aunt in which she gave her blessing.