I know you have an unnatural obsession with GaGa (my guess is her peen is bigger than she advertises and you are completely after it), but this is simply not attractive. Even you have to admit it. Lose the 3 gallons of burnt orange crayola, lady, and then we'll talk.
No one has mentioned the possibility that perhaps all of these events are coinciding with fertility treatment. IVF in particular does not have set dates--the procedures that accompany it are scheduled last minute based on your body's response. I personally think she is putting family before career and if that's the case, good for her!
No, Perez did not write this article, and that is clear, but he posted it and we all know why. His opinions are in dead in line with the ones expressed here, so you might as well comment away, people!
P-Nasty, I have generally been happy to see you take a stand against home wreckers, but what is the difference here? As others mentioned, I really think you're siding with this home wrecker based on who you would personally like to schmooze with. Brangelina would def. give you more gossip street cred, but good luck with that!
By the way, no where within this article was their any evidence that Jennifer created this 'poor Jen' persona. It is completely media generated. Instead, she is sharing in a classy way what happened to her and is the one insistent on moving on. It's media that is still painting drama where there likely is none.
Love ya, Perez, but I don't get the dichotomy you present so often. In one post, you're flaming Rachel Evan Wood for being a home-wrecker, and the next you're glorifying another home-wrecker: Angelina. What gives?
WeekWeak at 12:46 11/22/2008WeekWeak at 12:43 11/22/2008By the way, no where within this article was their any evidence that Jennifer created this 'poor Jen' persona. It is completely media generated. Instead, she is sharing in a classy way what happened to her and is the one insistent on moving on. It's media that is still painting drama where there likely is none.
TEAM ANISTON!