on The Truth About Guy Ritchie - World Exclusive! at 11:25 10/21/2008

And also, the character being portrayed here is very different to the character we see in the media- as Madonna's sources themselves say, he loves going down the pub, being a normal guy, I've never seen him on lavish outtings, shopping trips or in flashy clothes and jewellry (like, say, david beckham-in fact, he's the exact opposite) he doesn't seem that bothered with wealth judging by his appearance- Ive never seen him in flashy cars or anything, it just doesn't seem to add up. Surely if he was a golddigger he would have tried to pimp out various parts of their relationshiplike selling stories and photos from their wedding etc there were never reports on any of that kind of thing. But who knows.

on The Truth About Guy Ritchie - World Exclusive! at 11:19 10/21/2008

Mmmmm, I don't know if I believe that....the sources are biased and it sounds exagerated and theatrical. He comes from old money and being interested in fame and golddigging is not a trait of old monied types- he certainly is no Heather Mills- he is not screaming from the rooftops and demnding huge sums of money- sources say he doesn't want any of her money, just access to their children- why should madonna sources be believed and not guys?

on Saint Ange or Not? at 20:02 10/17/2008 as a reply on the comment by HipGnosis

I take offence to the "lesser selves" part- I am no less than her. The intentions behind my post was not to make myself feel better, rather to point out that she conradicts herself and appears to be unapologetic about something she should be wise enough to talk about with a little bit of sensitivity. Regardless of whether she slept with him or not, she needs to think about how other people may feel about the "falling in love on set" section. She is no saint.

on Saint Ange or Not? at 19:10 10/17/2008

If they were my parents and they showed me that film when I was 16/17 I would be thinking.. right, dad but you were married to someone else, right? At that age I'd like to think their kids- what with knowing the difference between right and wrong coz Angelina and Brad obviously do(!) and growing up with all the "morals and wisdoms" their parents have to offer- would realise that this wasn't necessarily right. And I cannot believe that with all her "wisdom" she could contradict herself so much- she may not have had sex with him but she allowed herself to fall in love with a married man. Fair enough if she'd just admit it, I might have respect for her but saying she did nothing wrong because they didn't have sex shows she's not apologetic and it's an insult to Jennifer. I think there is something very devious and nasty about this woman and I wouldn't trust her as far as I could throw her.

on Sexy Hockey Mom Boo'd! at 05:40 10/13/2008 as a reply on the comment by arrora

I'm sure Sarah Palin would be thrilled to have someone like you fighting her corner...I think before you continue on with your tirade of of abuse and hoping people burn in hell you take a step back and look at some of the disgusting things you've said. On the up side you are single handedly giving everyone here more reason to vote for Obama. Freedom of speech is a great thing as it highlights the dangers of people like you and what you stand for. I have no doubt you will reply with your bile but I will not respond further.