Here's why it's OK. The world is NOT universal. Seeing Girl on Girl for most people = hot. Seeing Guy on Guy = gross. I don't make the rules or govern how people think. However, it is how 95% of the world does think, so accept it instead of thinking your "agenda" is going to turn anyone. All it does is make things worse for the gay community. Watch and see...this outwardly gay thing from Adam Lambert is going to hugely backfire and he'll be off everyone's radar and begging for a stand-in role in the next Constantine play soon.
Being a flaming homosexual is the way to lose. Being a conservative homo works better for middle america. No one is hating Neil Patrick Harris, as an example. But be honest instead of opinionated and you will see that there are zero careers that are successful when the artist starts off from the beginning as outwardly gay. The only ones that have ever had success, and maintained it for that matter, are the people that didn't flaunt it before they came out, or after for that matter. Rob Halford, Elton John, NP Harris - all did it the right way. Glambert is a punk kid that thinks he's gonna change how people think? See you again on some 2014 trivia game question, dumbbell.
Whether MJ was a kid toucher or not, he was definitely a drug addict that died by overdose. He's not the kind of person to be honored legally by our elected representatives.
In fact, how about the Senate and the Congress worry about the economy instead of how Michael Jackson is represented. Jackson Lee was an idiot to even bring this up while people in her state are losing jobs. King can comment all he wants...after he fixes the economic situation in his state. Everyone should stop trying for the daily soundbyte and get back to doing their f*cking jobs!
Maybe they should have Lady Gaga perform, right perez? Your taste in music is sh*t..so you are hardly one to say what would or wouldn't work at a gig...you jagoff!
perez - maybe you should read what he said here and realize that what he said is 150% true. Most people, outside of LA and NYC, couldn't give a damn about supporting the gay lifestyle, and find it vulgar. To be blunt, we don't want gay rights, and don't want to be subjected to the gay lifestyle in our lives or our view. You want it - then fight for it. Most people don't want it, and won't support it. Live with it - we're not into the gay.
Being a flaming homosexual is the way to lose. Being a conservative homo works better for middle america. No one is hating Neil Patrick Harris, as an example. But be honest instead of opinionated and you will see that there are zero careers that are successful when the artist starts off from the beginning as outwardly gay. The only ones that have ever had success, and maintained it for that matter, are the people that didn't flaunt it before they came out, or after for that matter. Rob Halford, Elton John, NP Harris - all did it the right way. Glambert is a punk kid that thinks he's gonna change how people think? See you again on some 2014 trivia game question, dumbbell.
In fact, how about the Senate and the Congress worry about the economy instead of how Michael Jackson is represented. Jackson Lee was an idiot to even bring this up while people in her state are losing jobs. King can comment all he wants...after he fixes the economic situation in his state. Everyone should stop trying for the daily soundbyte and get back to doing their f*cking jobs!