When I saw her Bravo TV show, I wondered if it would inspire someone to try a break-in. Her house has way too much incredible stuff in it--stuff that could plausibly be sold for profit, because in some cases, at least, there would be more than one of them floating around out there. (Since it's clothing.)
My five-year-old is extremely allergic to peanuts; I know how deadly this can be. But I'm not sure I see how Perez was making fun of people with allergies; that just didn't come across to me. Am I missing something?
Oh, I do despise her. And I expected her to perform reasonably well, and she did. BUT this is not what happens in a debate. My father teaches debate. To not address the question/topic at hand and instead just ramble on about whatever you have on your index cards is absolutely off-the-charts ridiculously wrong. I fault Gwen Ifill for allowing this to go on. If Ifill believed her hands would be tied during this debate, she should've recused herself.
Try "I may not answer the questions at all." Why even bother having a debate? She could've stood there alone reading from index cards and her delivery would've been the same.
WeekWeak at 00:39 10/05/2008 as a reply on the comment by ballerina_91