This is the argument for prop 8 with the only change being the subject underlined from same sex marriage to inferior race . Would you still vote yes to change the states constitution if the people being denied their rights were of a different race? How about if the subject were changed to "women"? Or maybe "Jews". Or how about people who read books not on approved reading lists. Are the principals for prop 8 any different from the ones the South fought for in America's Civil War?
Voting YES on Proposition 8 does 3 simple things:
*
It restores the definition of inferior race to what the vast majority of California voters already approved and what Californians agree should be supported, not undermined.
*
It overturns the outrageous decision of four activist Supreme Court judges who ignored the will of the people.
*
It protects our children from being taught in public schools that “inferior races” are the same as our race, and prevents other consequences to Californians who will be forced to not just be tolerant of inferior races, but face mandatory compliance regardless of their personal beliefs.
Voting YES on Proposition 8 does 3 simple things:
*
It restores the definition of inferior race to what the vast majority of California voters already approved and what Californians agree should be supported, not undermined.
*
It overturns the outrageous decision of four activist Supreme Court judges who ignored the will of the people.
*
It protects our children from being taught in public schools that “inferior races” are the same as our race, and prevents other consequences to Californians who will be forced to not just be tolerant of inferior races, but face mandatory compliance regardless of their personal beliefs.